Redirect

Page loading...

Page Redirection If you are not redirected automatically, please visit our Facebook page

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

Obama's Tax Structure Will Crush Philanthropy


Just so you understand the relayed article below, let me abbreviate the main point for you. "Redistribution of wealth" doesn't entitle more people in need getting more aid. It's quite the opposite actually. Less people get aid, the trick socialists use to counter this argument is something like, "Yeah, but people are still getting aid - it's just coming from the government."

So let me get this straight... we're supposed to be ok with a democratically elected president taking the hard-earned money from a socioeconomic class who on average doesn't vote for his party... so that he can give it to the people who do? Doesn't anyone see a problem with this? Obama's literally saying, "No, you can't donate money how you want. I'm taking the money you would normally donate and giving it to people who will vote for my friends."

This is how socialism and communism work people. Americans have to get over this ridiculous idea which suggests that unless we have a hammer and sickle flying over the white house it isn't socialism. When the government starts viewing the wealth of some individuals as the property of the collective, and then redistributes that wealth to its constituency, we can safely say the worry over socialism and communism is warranted.
Obama's Tax Plan Could Cause Giving by the Wealthy to Drop by Several Billion Dollars Annually
February 27, 2009
THE CHRONICLE OF PHILANTHROPY

President Obama’s tax proposals — including a limit on charitable giving deductions that could be taken by America’s wealthiest people — could cause giving by America’s wealthy to drop by several billion dollars a year, according to estimates released today by the Indiana University Center on Philanthropy.

The center looked at how the proposals Mr. Obama released on Thursday would have affected giving based on 2006 data showing how much taxpayers deducted for charitable contributions. It said that if Mr. Obama’s tax plan had been in effect, Americans with incomes of $250,000 or more would have decreased their giving by 4.6 percent or nearly $3.9-billion. People at that income level claimed more than $81-billion in charitable gifts in 2006.

The drop in giving is less stark when looked at in the context of how it would affect all Americans who itemize on their tax forms and claim charitable deductions. Total giving by people who itemize would have dropped just 2.1 percent if the Obama plan had been in effect in 2006, the center estimated. Itemized charitable contributions totaled nearly $187-billion that year.

But the center cautioned that giving is far more likely to be affected by the condition of the stock market than by President Obama’s tax proposals. It noted that every time the stock market declines by 100 points, giving declines by $1.85-billion. Charitable donations rise by that same amount when the stock market increases.

President Obama’s proposal to limit charitable-giving deductions would apply to people with $250,000 or more in income. The center said that approximately 4 million tax returns, or nearly 3 percent of tax returns, came from individuals with incomes of $200,000 or more.

In a statement, Patrick M. Rooney, interim director of the Indiana center, said he worried about the effect of the tax change at a time when the downturn in the economy has put a squeeze on many donors and the charities they support.

“Tax incentives do stimulate more giving,” Mr. Rooney said, “and the challenges facing the nonprofit sector in 2009 suggest that this might be a good time to provide additional incentives, rather than reduce the value of the tax deduction for high-income households, so that the donors with the greatest capacity to give have more reasons to do so.”
Post a Comment

Conservative Brawler's Archive

Brawler's Search